Wednesday, April 18, 2012

BUSTED: Debra Irvine forced to step down for violating GOP By laws.

Debra Irvine was just forced to step down for violating GOP By laws.
At the Monday night Summit County GOP meeting on March 12th I publicly called on Debra Irvine to step down as GOP chair.
She turned beet red, tried to laugh it off and told me, "Not a chance."
So, I decided to post a story warning the delegates that were heading to the state convention to not vote for her because of her under handed practices. You can read the story here. http://www.StopDebraIrvine.com/

I sent her a text message on April 13th demanding she step down by Monday the 16th or I would publish all the dirt I have on her that was shared with me from the people closest to her over the years.

This is a portion of her emailed response later on that day.

Letter dated 4/13 to Summit GOP Central Committee.

I will be resigning at our next Central Committee meeting on May 14, 2012 at which time we will elect a new chairman. Our bylaws require that an officer vacancy be filled by an election by the Central Committee.
Sincerely

Debra Irvine
Chairman
Summit County Republicans


Now Monday, May 14th, is almost a month after the April 16th deadline I gave her in my text message to her. Thus the reason for me writing this story.
Debra then proceeded to lie, (something that comes very naturally to her) and tell everyone in another email that she was "planning all along to step down" and that it had nothing to do with her unethical behavior. Her ego is like nothing I have ever seen. What does the Bible say about Pride coming before the fall?

"I'd be hard pressed to find someone more delusional than her" was a common comment I've personally heard from several central committee members.

She then broke some more GOP By laws on April 17th and used her Chair Position to make SEVERAL illegal press releases trying to bolster her deflating HD 61 campaign against Constitutionalist David Justice. She only earned one more delegate vote than Justice which gives her top line on the primary ballot.
That one vote was the one she stole from me!! (See http://www.StopDebraIrvine.com/)
They now go head to head in the up coming GOP primary.
David must win the primary because he is the only one who can "defeat" the other candidate for the Republican nomination.

Well, it seems, she broke one "by law" too many. Finally! After being reported to the State GOP Chair, Ryan Call, this was the email everyone received.

"As you know, I sent out notice last Friday that I would be resigning. Today I am stepping aside to allow our Vice Chairman of Operations assume all duties of Acting Chairman of the Summit County GOP - to take responsibility for the upcoming Lincoln Day Dinner on May 4 and to administer the election of a new County Party Chairman at the meeting of the County Central Committee meeting already scheduled for May 14.

I make this decision for no other reason than to avoid even the potential for the appearance of conflict between the roles as Republican candidate and Chairman. It is important to maintain the transparency and integrity of the Party process that we've worked hard on."


What hog wash. Debra is the queen of double speak. Slavery is Freedom, Ignorance is strength, war is peace and Debra Irvine should be elected to the State legislature.
Finally the Summit County GOP can move forward and embrace real republican values that have been suppressed these past 5 years!!! Good riddence. What a breath of fresh air!!!

Joby Weeks
Blue River





































Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Debra Irvine should step down as Summit County GOP Chair and abandon her HD 61 campaign.

Summit County GOP Chair Debra Irvine, Candidate for HD 61, Secretary Elizabeth Wickert and Treasurer Jay Brunvand, deprived me of my right to vote at the Summit County Republican Convention on Saturday, March 10th 2012.

I believe that because of the corruption I have uncovered in the Summit County Republican Party, Debra Irvine should step down as the Summit County GOP Chair and abandon her House District race.

Its so bad up here, in fact, that the GOP State Chair, Ryan Call, who over sees 64 Counties, had to drive up from Denver to officiate our convention, even though only 20 delegates to the state convention were at stake.

If you don't know Debra Irvine, you're probably wondering, why all the attention to such a small county? Why would a HD 61 candidate take the time to violate my rights and go after me?

How did I become such a threat to the old guard big government Republican establishment in Colorado?

Well, it started back in 2009 when I was elected to become the Summit County Vice Chair. I changed my voter registration from Denver to Breckenridge the day of the election. My wife Steph kept her registration at the house we were selling in Denver. No one knew me but they liked what I had to say about limited government, following the constitution, restoring sound money and ending the wars. I shared with them how I come from a family of Republican Senators and Congressmen who held positions in several presidential cabinets throughout the years and what it was like to go to the National Convention in 2008 etc. Well, the room full of people heard the candidates speeches, took a vote and I was elected.

Later on that week, after doing a thorough investigation on me, Debra Irvine realized that a real Constitutionalist was now her Vice Chair. This is actually a bad thing in her eyes. She, and several other central committee members, like to publicly praise the constitution, our founding principles, freedom and personal responsibility but deep down they actually despise them based on their actions. It doesn't surprise me given that Deb grew up with the socialism of Europe as did Liz Wickert who's a British American.

I find that an easy way to avoid being fooled when picking a candidate to represent us, that we need to watch what they do, not what they say.

Debra Irvine decided that to get me to step down as Vice Chair, she had to invalidate her own election that she held. So she decided to tell everyone that she made a mistake in the election procedures and was nullifying my win. She called for a new election at the next Monday meeting. This was surprising to me. I didn't realize that she stabs people in the back that she pretends she is friends with. I also didn't know that Debra Irvine was going around that month to the people of Summit County and getting them to fill out proxy votes for the new election. She had to get proxies because the people who answer to her couldn't be bothered to take the time to show up in person to vote against me.
On the night of the new "valid" election only about 10 people showed up for the vote. However, Deb collected around 15 proxy votes cast against me. Thus, Debra Irvine got Lisa Knoble, another big government "conservative" whom she could boss around easier than me, to take my Vice Chair spot.

This was before Lisa discovered Debra Irvine's true colors. I decided to forgive them for their silly games and step down. My wife Steph and I decided to get married on the beach in the Bahamas and travel around the world for a while.

After our honeymoon, we came back to Breck and decided to get politically active again. Steph changed her registration from Denver to Breck after we sold the house.

In December, the owner of the house we rent in Breck decided that he wanted to start using the house again from time to time. So, I decided to purchase a financial interest in a property with fluoride free well water in Blue River so we could have a place to go when the owner wanted to come up to use the Breck house. I moved a bunch of stuff into our room over there, I keep one of our cars there and from time to time we stay there while the Breck house is being used. I changed my voter registration to my Blue River address before the Jan 7th dead line. I also changed my drivers license to reflect the new address as well as the address on my CCW permit so I would be officially representing precinct 3 at the Feb 7th caucus.

Steph thought a good way to get politically connected would be to help the Mayor of Breck, John Warner, with his dental practice because of her background in dentistry. She never got around to changing her address from Breck to Blue River so at caucus she represented precinct 18.

At the caucus I decided to create several resolutions for the delegates from each precinct to introduce. One was to protect our gun rights, (which Jay Brunvand, a fake republican, actually voted against) I introduced another resolution to stop the mass poisoning and forced medication of the people in Summit County with fluoride. The 3rd was to stop the FDA tyranny against natural organic farmers and producers of raw milk and the final one was to regulate marijuana like alcohol which would show support for the state wide initiative that is on the ballot this coming November.

At the caucus, Debra Irvine told us that the resolutions didn't need to be introduced or voted on because we would do all that at the County Convention. This turned out to not be true. In between the caucus and convention she formed a "committee" with Mark Hurlbert, our District Attorney, to shoot them down. He decided that the assembly at the county convention should not be allowed to vote on 3 of the 4 resolutions despite numerous objections from several delegates in the assembly asking that we be allowed to vote on them. Her answer was no. Once Mark's committee rejected them, were we allowed to re-introduce them at the county convention, as promised caucus night, even when it was seconded, so a vote could be cast in favor of the assembly? No, she silenced us which violated the GOP by laws which state that Roberts Rules of order are the way to preside over the meetings.

During the caucus I found out the Mayor of Blue River lives in my precinct. She and her husband are supporters of Willard "Mitt" Romney. They wanted to be delegates to the county convention so that Obama-care, Cap-n-trade, abortion, gay marriage, big government spending, gun control, and the elitist status quo can continue. Well, I spoke to my neighbors and explained to them that they should vote for me because I will put principles over party and follow the Constitution. I was elected to be a Delegate, they were not... Steph was also elected a Delegate from her precinct as well!

This made Debra Irvine very upset. Wait till you hear what she did!

On the morning of the county convention, after I voluntarily showed up an hour early to help set up the chairs in the room, I was called over by Jay Brunvand, the summit county GOP Treasurer.
He told me that an "investigatory committee" was created to investigate whether I should be seated as a delegate even though my precinct elected me to represent them. He said that Elizabeth Wickert, our secretary, the one who bragged about living all over the world in the Summit Daily Newspaper, Sunday, March 11th article, had filed a complaint with the County Clerk and Recorder challenging my right to represent my precinct and vote. Ironic right? A Brit trying to take away an American's right to vote...

Little did I know, the month in-between the caucus and county convention, HD 61 candidate, the impartial Debra Irvine herself, Elizabeth Wickert and her husband Al were conducting an investigation on me because my wife and I got elected as delegates. They were acting as unlicensed private investigators and admitted as much on video tape. There are heavy penalties for people who practice medicine without a license or lawyers who practice in states where their BAR license isn't valid.

12-58.5-103. Definitions.
(5) "Private investigation" means an investigation for the purpose of obtaining information pertaining to:
(b) The identity, reputation, character, habits, conduct, business occupation, honesty, integrity, credibility, knowledge, trustworthiness, efficiency, loyalty, activity, movements, whereabouts, affiliations, associations, or transactions of a person or group of persons;
(g) Securing evidence to be used before an investigatory committee or board of award or arbitration or in the preparation for or in a civil or criminal trial;

These are the words that stood out for me.
"movements, whereabouts"
"securing evidence to be used before an investigatory committee"

Debra Irvine, Elizabeth Wickert and Al even showed up to the house, unannounced and uninvited. I believe this would be considered trespassing. They wanted to see if I was there and asked my house mate if "my clothes were in my closet". I thought this was strange that Debra Irvine, the HD 61 candidate and Chair of the Summit County Republican Party was snooping around our house at night... but wait, it gets better!

While conducting their illegal investigation, they got stuck in the snowbank right in front of the house! How embarrassing it must have been for them to come to the door and ask my house mate and one of our neighbors if they could help pull them out of the ditch! Instead of telling them to call a tow truck, my friends helped them get out. Do you the reader, think Debra Irvine would have told me to call a tow truck if she busted me snooping around in front of her house at night, getting stuck in the snow? With Debra Irvine, no good deed goes unpunished.

On March 9th, a day before the convention, Kathleen Neel, the County Clerk, rejected Elizbeth's complaint because 1-9-101 (1) (a) C.R.S. states that "The written challenge and supporting evidence shall be filed with the clerk and Recorder no later than 60 days before any election." There is an election on April 3rd and thus the complaint falls in-between the 60 day limit. Their complaint was rejected, yet they still went along with it.

The morning of the convention, Jay Brunvand told me that the "committee" decided 4-0 that I should not be seated as a delegate because they didn't feel that I had enough evidence to prove that I live in Blue River.
I asked them what evidence did they have that proves otherwise? None, other than my wife is still registered at our other house.
I asked them where in the by laws it says a husband and wife have to be registered at the same address to be able to vote? No where...
I asked if I was registered to vote in other states or counties? Their response was No.
I showed them my government issued id, which in Colorado you don't need to do to cast a vote, and asked them if they thought I was an illegal. They said no.

So, I told them, "In America, you are innocent until proven guilty not the other way around. You have given me no evidence and you haven't explained to me how your information was obtained for you to come to the "opinion" that I do no live where my voter registration card says I live. Im not trying to cast multiple votes in multiple jurisdictions am I?"

I immediately called my house mate John and asked him to bring with him to the convention the signed lease we had and to print my voter registration form off of the secretary of state website.
He brought them with him, we showed the committee the forms and he testified that I in fact do live there and that my clothes are in the closet and tooth brush is in the bathroom since Liz Wickert asked.

They told me that because I changed my registration with the secretary of state on line through their own web based system, that it was unacceptable. I was confused. "If registering online is NOT ok, why do they offer it as an option for people? Why do you invalidate your own rules and procedures?" They gave me no answer.

So, even though I brought 2 eye witnesses, a signed lease, a government issued ID and a voter registration card which was filed before the January 7th deadline, they told me there was no evidence to prove I live where I say I live and that I wasn't allowed to exercise my constitutional right to vote, so that was that. Yet, with the same forms, a couple years earlier, I was able to set up a PO Box, register to vote and it was completely fine with them...

Well, this is not right because their complaint was rejected by the county clerk, so I asked Sheriff John Minor, who was acting as the sergeant of arms, to stop them from violating my rights and to have them arrested.
He chuckled and said that I would have to sue them in court and that there is nothing he could do.

I thought for a minute and remembered that Roberts Rules of Order were still in play, I made a motion, which was seconded, for my name to be re-inserted back into the credentials delegate list so I could be seated.
Debra Irvine took it to the assembly which was, of course, stacked with her friends. Despite the witness testimony and evidence I presented with such sort notice, the majority of the crowd voted to not allow me to participate as a delegate in my current precinct or my old precinct which stripped me of my constitutionally protected right to vote. In a Republic, the rights of the individual are protected. In a Democracy, its mob rule.

Debra Irvine railroaded me and now the whole world is going to know about it.

I requested a copy of the Republican bylaws and found that they do not say that married couples have to share the same address or that I need a drivers license to vote. I did, however, change my residence on my Drivers License through the DMV but my license doesn't expire until 2015. When I changed it, they just told me to write my new address on the back of my license, which I did. Several people told me that the address on their ID's are not the same as the address that they are registered to vote at either. I asked to see their ID's to verify and sure enough, one persons license said they lived in Lakewood (Jefferson county) but were voting in Summit and another person said they had 2 houses, their drivers license was at one and the registration was at the other. They were delegates and they were allowed to vote.

The Senate candidate, Baumgartner, who is currently a state House rep, spoke on stage and said he had two ranches. He told me the ranches are in different districts (one in Grand and the other near steamboat in Jackson county). Will his voting credentials be challenged at an upcoming meeting of the State House? Will people be snooping around asking him which closet he keeps his clothes in? Doubt it. Should they? Sure, if he is registered to vote in both places at the same time.

Time has shown that exercising my rights under Debra Irvine's big sister tyranny is not allowed. Imagine, she wants us to vote for her to represent us in the State Legislature!? She must think the voters in Summit County are stupid. If she will do this with her own people, Republicans, what will she do to Democrats once she has real power? This is a warning for those living in Summit County, Debra Irvine is not someone you should trust or vote for.

However, there is another candidate that I met at the convention who is running against Debra Irvine for HD 61. His name is David Justice. I want to let you know up front that I am not a part of his campaign in any way. He did, however, make a great speech at the convention and sounds like a true constitutionalist. We spoke afterwards and I believe that he, not Debra, would take his oath of office seriously. He told me he would never act the way Debra has acted toward anyone. He told me that, "This is not a legal way of taking away someone's lawful right to vote." Turns out, I happen to agree with him, not only on that statement but on a whole lot of his other positions as well.

I decided to look up some law and found that in 1-13-301, C.R.S. states that "Any person in AUTHORITY at any precinct, caucus, assembly, or CONVENTION who in any manner dishonestly, corruptly, or fraudulently performs any act devolving on him/her by virtue of the position of trust which he/she fills or knowingly AIDS OR ABETS any other person to do any fraudulent, dishonest or corrupt act or thing in reference to the carrying on of any precinct caucus, assembly, or convention or the ascertaining or promulgating of its true will is guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof, shall be punished as provided in section." 1-13-111

Looks like this statute applies to Debra Irvine, Ryan Call, Jay Brunvand and Elizabeth Wickert who publicly attacked my reputation and integrity even after the County Clerk rejected their challenge. Ouch!

Am I going to pursue this? If Deb steps down as GOP Chair and drops out of the race, No.

There's some good news though, several people, I had never met before, witnessed the event and came over to me during the election with their ballots in hand. They told me they were disgusted with Debra Irvine's behavior. They asked me who I would vote for if I was allowed to vote. I told them who the constitutionalists were and they voted for the people I would have voted for out of principle.
Debra Irvine's attempt to silence me back fired. Her own Vice Chair, Lisa Knoble, voted to allow me to be seated and is supporting her rival, David Justice. After the event, she came over to me and said that she was surprised Debra Irvine would stoop to this level being a candidate and all. "Especially over 1 vote." That 1 vote that was stolen from me will now hopefully cost Debra Irvine thousands of lost votes if not the election itself because I am now going public with the truth about her. This article would never have been written otherwise. Im tired of being harassed by these people.

One last point for you to hear before you make your decision on who to vote for this coming election for HD 61. I received a phone call from a candidate wanting my support. I asked him how he got my number. He said he got the delegate list from Debra. So, I sent Debra Irvine an email, phone call and text, requesting a list of the delegates that were going to the county convention so I could send them a post card asking them to vote for me to be a delegate to the State Convention. She undoubtedly gave the list out to other candidates but when confronted, she lied to me in writing and told me that she hadn't given the list out to anyone. I reconfirmed this fact with the person who called me at the convention. Debra is a liar, plain and simple. Most politicians are. I simply asked her in my email to play nice, to be fair and impartial. She chose time and again not to...

I never did get the delegate list but I do have the contact details of the perpetrators. If you would like to tell Debra Irvine, Elizabeth Wickert, Ryan Call or Jay Brunvand how you feel over the phone or in person here is how they can be reached for comments.

Again, please take this warning from a Republican insider. Do not vote for Deb Irvine. Call her and ask her to step down as Summit County GOP Chair.

Thanks for your help,
Joby Weeks

Debra Irvine
0037 Packsaddle Lane
Breckenridge CO 80424
970-547-5875
cell 719-238-1462
Debra4GOP@aol.com

Elizabeth Wickert
375 Revett Dr
Breckenridge CO 80424
970-453-4778

Jay Brunvand
398 Willow Lake Ct
Silverthorne CO 80498
970-468-5782

Ryan Call
303-641-4274





Monday, August 31, 2009

End the Fed

End The FED
by Gary North
LewRockwell.com
Sun, Aug 30th, 2009 12:00:00 am

I do not recall this in my lifetime. A majority in the House of Representatives has co-signed H.R. 1207, a bill introduced by Ron Paul to have the Federal Reserve System audited by an independent government agency, the Comptroller General's office.

The bill has been bottled up in committee by Barney Frank, who has insisted that he is doing this in order to better coordinate consideration of the best way to gain greater transparency from the Federal Reserve. He has not said that he favors an independent audit of the FED.

It would be easy for Congressman Frank to hold hearings on the bill. This would allow Dr. Paul to bring in expert witnesses on the FED to make the case for an independent audit. It would get a lot of YouTube play. It would be the first time since the replacement of eccentric Congressman Wright Patman in 1975 as the chairman of the House Banking Committee that the FED has been exposed to anything like serious criticism in Congress. (Patman, an inflationist and a greenbacker, hated the FED. He was chairman of the House Banking Committee, 1965–75.) Congressman Frank has yet to announce hearings.

There was a posting on the DailyPaul site that Frank will hold hearings soon. Someone heard it on the radio. I will believe it when I see the YouTube videos.

The FED in June hired a public relations expert, Linda Robinson, to deal with Congress. She was formerly a lobbyist for Enron. I have little doubt that it was H.R. 1207 that forced the FED into this move.

Now Ron Paul's book, End the Fed, is about to be published. It is expected to become a best-seller. Think about this. There have been books attacking the Federal Reserve System for over ninety years, but they have been written by obscure people who no one in the general public has heard of. They have not sold well. They have not been written by someone who persuaded over half of the House of Representatives to support a bill to audit the FED. They have not been written by someone who once raised over $30 million in a run for President.

This is unprecedented. For the first time in the history of the Federal Reserve System, there are literally millions of people who have heard of the FED and who would like to see it shut down.

There have been academic and investment critics of this or that policy of the FED, most notably Milton Friedman, who criticized the FED for not inflating enough, 1930–33. But there has never been a serious audience ready to listen to arguments on why a system of 12 private banks should oversee monetary policy, and why one of them, the New York Federal Reserve Bank, should execute this policy without having to answer to anyone.

THE BLOOMBERG LAWSUIT

The Bloomberg news service has sued the Board of Governors of the FED under the Freedom of Information Act. The lawsuit says that it is illegal for the Board of Governors to refuse to release information on which banks have received financial aid from the FED.

The Board of Governors countered with this argument. The New York FED is a privately owned entity. It executes monetary policy. It is not subject to the Freedom of Information Act. The FED also argued that the banking system would be threatened by the release of this information.

This case went to court. The judge ruled on August 24 that the Board of Governors of the FED must make this information public no later than August 31.

On August 26, the FED asked the judge not to enforce her ruling. Why not? Because it would be bad for the banking system. She had heard that argument before.

Well, what else? The Board of Governors' lawyer insisted that the Board has no knowledge of what the New York FED – its legal agent – really does. The lawyer said, "We don't control the system of record-keeping in New York." She insisted that the Board of Governors just cannot find out what the New York FED did with the money in time to meet the deadline.

Apparently, the Board of Governors, a government agency, has taken seriously Jesus' words regarding charity (alms):

But when thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth: That thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly (Matthew 6:3–4).



The two FEDS, the government one and the private one, were surely involved in the charity business, to the tune of a trillion dollars or so. This was a system of handouts on an unprecedented scale.

The Father in Washington has surely rewarded the FED in the past. The FED expects more of the same in the future. But now this pesky lawsuit forces an opening of the books.

Is the lawyer's argument credible? Perhaps the judge will not regard it as credible. So, the FED had another argument. The FED wants her to wait until the case can be heard on appeal. But there was a hitch. The FED did not say when it intends to appeal.

Here is the FED, with a court ruling against it, and with the clock ticking, admitting that it has no date set to file an appeal. Its lawyers apparently had no fall-back position. Is this credible? Of course not.

Will it work? We shall see. If it does work, and if H. R. 1207 remains bottled up in committee, the growing army of people who have finally found out about the FED will have two more pieces of evidence that the U.S. government does not run the FED.

If the bill passes the House and the Senate, Obama will veto it. The FED is not going to be audited by the government. That is not how the world works. The FED is only officially under government authority. Except in wartime, it has never been under government authority. It was set up to provide the illusion of government control. That illusion has worked since 1913.

The FED does face a major problem. If it escapes from both the Congress and the courts, this will sell lots more copies of "End the Fed." On the other hand, if the court system finally forces the FED to reveal who got what and on what terms, then banks in the future will hesitate to go to the FED, hat in hand, because the public learn who was begging for a bailout. This is not the sort of information that big bank bankers want the financial press to discover, let alone the Internet.

The handouts went to the big banks. Most banks were ignored. They were allowed to sink or swim. This has created a problem: bank bankruptcies every weekend for as far as the eye can see.

416 PROBLEM BANKS

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, flush with a $30 billion loan from Congress, has announced that its list of problem banks climbed in one month from 305 to 416. The list is secret, of course, for the same reason that the New York FED's list is secret. The FDIC does not want to cause a run on any of the 416 banks.

A bank run these days takes the form of wire transfers and checks written to other banks to open an account. The money supply remains constant. Some banks lose; others win. The bad banks go bust.

The FDIC then has to buy up all of their bad assets. Solvent banks then buy the good assets. The big winners are the solvent banks that buy their rivals' assets at fire-sale prices. The big losers are taxpayers and investors who believe that all of the Treasury debt that Congress must sell to cover its loan to the FDIC will be repaid in real money some day.

On August 27, the FDIC announced that its member institutions lost $3.7 billion in the second quarter of 2009. In a press release that was reminiscent of "Spin City," the head of the FDIC, Sheila Bair, announced:

"While challenges remain, evidence is building that the U.S. economy is starting to grow again," said FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair. "Banking industry performance is – as always – a lagging indicator. The banking industry, too, can look forward to better times ahead. But, for now, the difficult and necessary process of recognizing loan losses and cleaning up balance sheets continues to be reflected in the industry's bottom line."



Translation: "The economy is better off than the banks are, and the economy remains in the pits. Why? Because banks are not lending. Someday, things will turn around for the banking system as a whole, but don't get your hopes up. Cleaning up bank balance sheets these days is comparable to cleaning up the Augean stables, for all you classics buffs out there."

Chairman Bair went on to say, "The FDIC was created specifically for times such as these. No matter how challenging the environment, the FDIC has ample resources to continue protecting depositors as we have for the last 75 years. No insured depositor has ever lost a penny of insured deposits...and no one ever will."



Translation: "Congress may have to fork over another couple of hundred bullion – maybe $500 billion, if Senator Dodd's bill is signed into law – but no one will ever lose a penny in an FDIC-insured bank. But taxpayers will pay a pretty penny to whoever buys all those T-bills that Congress will have to issue to keep the FDIC solvent."

The press release reported the following.

1. Total assets of insured institutions declined by $238 billion.
2. The number of institutions on the FDIC's "Problem List" rose. At the end of June, there were 416 insured institutions on the "Problem List," up from 305 on March 31.
3. Total reserves of the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) stood at $42 billion. [No mention of the $30 billion loan from Congress to get reserves back up.]

How bad is this number: 416 problem banks? Not as bad as 1882 problem banks. That is the estimate of Institutional Risk Analytics, a private research firm. The organization gave a grade of F to 1882 banks, as of June 30. This figure was up by 16.5% since late March.

What about the number of A-rated banks? The number was down by 21% since late March.

This list does not include the 19 big banks that went through the stress tests, which all of them passed. The stress tests assumed that big banks would have enough capital to withstand a 9% loss rate over the next two years. The problem is, according to the company's managing director, that we are already at 9% loss rates, and we are not yet at the bottom of the cycle. If the economy does not recover by the 4th quarter, banking statistics will head down in 2010. (http://tinyurl.com/nr2z67)

The Federal Reserve System intervened to save the financial system in 2008. But has the system as a whole recovered? No. Has unemployment stopped rising? No. Has the economy recovered? No.

GROWING HOSTILITY TO THE FED

Always in the past, the Federal Reserve has remained free from serious criticism. The media are obedient lap dogs. So are the academic economists. The textbooks never point out that the FED is the enforcing arm of a huge cartel. The professors refrain from applying to the FED their analyses in their chapters on cartels.

Today, for the first time, there is a growing audience of intelligent people who are being exposed to the truth about the FED. This has taken place outside Establishment channels, which includes the largest talk radio shows.

The FED has had a 90-year free ride. That ride is over. The FED will never again get off scot-free. The Web is sufficient to continue to inform people regarding the economic disasters that the FED has caused by its anti-recession, big-bank bailout policies.

Bernanke is pursuing the same low-interest rate policy that Greenspan pursued from mid-2000 to mid-2004. A few mainstream critics of Greenspan now say that his policy failed. But they refuse to say that Bernanke's policy is the same, and that the resulting crises will be worse.

The critics do not see the operations of the FED in terms of a consistent theory of monetary cause and effect. They view monetary policy as somehow based on the personality of the Chairman. Before, Greenspan was "the Maestro." Bernanke is "the Professor." The policies are the same: pump and dump. The FED pumps up the money supply, and the Treasury dumps T-bills and T-bonds on the FED.

The FED has promised to unwind its doubled monetary base (balance sheet) when the economy revives. In recent months, it has sold off some debt. The monetary base is down from its peak. The Treasury has been able to sell its debt to investors who still dear the economy. This cannot go on for more than a year unless the economy stays in recession. The size of the deficits will be too great.

The FED really is trapped unless the economy revives, commercial bank credit to private industry revives, and price inflation remains low. But a revival of commercial bank lending will turn the FED's monetary base into spendable money. The M1 money supply will double. The M1 money multiplier will go positive. At that point, the FED will have to unwind, meaning sell off assets. To whom? At what interest rate? It will be in competition with both the Treasury and Fannie/Freddie.

CONCLUSION

The FED has never had to play defense. It has had a free ride. The free ride is over.

The general public has still not heard of the FED. The FED still has the advantage of invisibility. But it is losing that invisibility. This is not going to change.

The FED is a legitimate target for people who think the government botches the economy. It is the classic example of the much-praised government-business alliance. It is the consummate model of that alliance. When it fails to achieve its twin official goals of low unemployment and low price inflation, millions of its economic victims will figure out who the culprit is.

End the Fed.

August 29, 2009

Gary North [send him mail] is the author of Mises on Money. Visit http://www.garynorth.com. He is also the author of a free 20-volume series, An Economic Commentary on the Bible.

Forced Vaccinations

Mike Adams
Natural News
August 28, 2009

The United States of America is devolving into medical fascism and Massachusetts is leading the way with the passage of a new bill, the “Pandemic Response Bill” 2028, reportedly just passed by the MA state Senate and now awaiting approval in the House. This bill suspends virtually all Constitutional rights of Massachusetts citizens and forces anyone “suspected” of being infected to submit to interrogations, “decontaminations” and vaccines.

featured stories   Forced vaccinations, quarantine camps, health care interrogations and mandatory decontaminations

featured stories   Forced vaccinations, quarantine camps, health care interrogations and mandatory decontaminations



The entire population of the USA is now but one pen stroke away from being subjected to mandatory swine flu vaccinations at gunpoint.


It’s also sets fines up to $1,000 per day for anyone who refuses to submit to quarantines, vaccinations, decontamination efforts or to follow any other verbal order by virtually any state-licensed law enforcement or medical personnel. You can read the text yourself here: http://www.mass.gov/legis/bills/sen…

Here’s some of the language contained in the bill:

(Violation of 4th Amendment: Illegal search and seizure)

During either type of declared emergency, a local public health authority… may exercise authority… to require the owner or occupier of premises to permit entry into and investigation of the premises; to close, direct, and compel the evacuation of, or to decontaminate or cause to be
decontaminated any building or facility; to destroy any material; to restrict or prohibit assemblages of persons;

(Violation of 14th Amendment; illegal arrest without a warrant)

…an officer authorized to serve criminal process may arrest without a warrant any person whom the officer has probable cause to believe has violated an order given to effectuate the purposes of this subsection and shall use reasonable diligence to enforce such order. [Gunpoint]

(Government price controls)

The attorney general, in consultation with the office of consumer affairs and business regulation, and upon the declaration by the governor that a supply emergency exists, shall take appropriate action to ensure that no person shall sell a product or service that is at a price that unreasonably exceeds the price charged before the emergency.

“Involuntary Transportation” (also known as kidnapping)

Law enforcement authorities, upon order of the commissioner or his agent or at the request of a local public health authority pursuant to such order, shall assist emergency medical technicians or other appropriate medical personnel in the involuntary transportation of such person to the tuberculosis treatment center.

$1,000 / day in fines

Any person who knowingly violates an order, as to which noncompliance poses a serious danger to public health as determined by the commissioner or the local public health authority, shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 30 days or a fine of not more than one thousand dollars per day that the violation continues, or both.

Forced vaccinations

Furthermore, when the commissioner or a local public health authority within its jurisdiction determines that either or both of the following measures are necessary to prevent a serious danger to the public health the commissioner or local public health authority may exercise the following authority: (1) to vaccinate or provide precautionary prophylaxis to individuals as protection against communicable disease…

Forced quarantine for those who refuse (illegal imprisonment without charge)

An individual who is unable or unwilling to submit to vaccination or treatment shall not be required to submit to such procedures but may be isolated or quarantined pursuant to section 96 of chapter 111 if his or her refusal poses a serious danger to public health or results in uncertainty whether he or she has been exposed to or is infected with a disease or condition that poses a serious danger to public health, as determined by the commissioner, or a local public health authority operating within its jurisdiction.

Arrest for refusal to be “decontaminated”

If an individual is unable or unwilling to submit to decontamination or procedures necessary for diagnosis, the decontamination or diagnosis procedures may proceed only pursuant to an order of the superior court… During the time necessary to obtain such court order, such individual may be isolated or quarantined pursuant to section 96 of chapter 111 if his or her refusal to submit to decontamination or diagnosis procedures poses a serious danger to public health or results in uncertainty whether he or she has been exposed to or is infected with a disease or condition that poses a serious danger to public health.

Interrogation

When the commissioner or a local public health authority within its jurisdiction reasonably believes that a person may have been exposed to a disease or condition that poses a threat to the public health, in addition to their authority under section 96 of chapter 111, the commissioner or the local public health authority may detain the person for as long as may be reasonably necessary for the commissioner or the local public health authority, to convey information to the person regarding the disease or condition and to obtain contact information… If a person detained under subsection (1) refuses to provide the information requested, the person may be isolated or quarantined pursuant to section 96 of chapter 111 if his or her refusal poses a serious danger to public health…

Forced isolation and quarantine

An order for isolation or quarantine may include any individual who is unwilling or unable to undergo vaccination, precautionary prophylaxis, medical treatment, decontamination, medical examinations, tests, or specimen collection and whose refusal of one or more of these measures poses a serious danger to public health or results in uncertainty whether he or she has been exposed to or is infected with a disease or condition that poses a serious danger to public health.

Forced entry into any home or building…

There’s a lot more in this bill, including language that allows Mass. police to enter any home or building without a search warrant, to destroy any object or building they suspect may pose a threat to public safety, to order the closing and / or decontamination of any facility using highly toxic chemical decontamination agents, and to arrest, detain and interrogate anyone who gets in their way.

Meanwhile, all state law enforcement and medical personnel are granted complete immunity from prosecution for their part in violating your Constitutional rights. So if they violate your right to due process, or they accidentally destroy your home, or they kill your family dog because they suspect it might be infected, you have absolutely zero recourse.

Under this bill, Massachusetts becomes a medical police state. There is no debating it. It’s all written, clear as day, in this law: The citizens of Massachusetts will have no rights, period. The Constitution is ancient history. You are now the property of the State.

Kiss your freedoms goodbye

Massachusetts, it seems, has never met a vaccine it didn’t like. This is the same state that rounded up the parents of schoolchildren who hadn’t been vaccinated, then corralled them into a courtroom (with attack dogs standing guard outside) and forced vaccine injections onto all the schoolchildren under the threat of jail time for parents who resisted.

Remember, readers, that this is all taking place in the “land of the free,” a nation that former President George Bush claimed was so envied around the world that terrorists attacked America because they “hate freedom” and wanted to destroy our way of life. But terrorists need no help attacking freedom as long as Massachusetts is in the vaccine game, because this latest form of “gunpoint medicine” destroys freedom for everyday Americans in a way that terrorists could have never hoped to accomplish with all the bombs in the world.

Massachusetts, it seems, has done what terrorists could not: It has turned “free” Americans into medical slave subjects who no longer have any freedom to decide the details of their own medical care. All options have been stripped from them but one: The Big Pharma option. That’s the one that involves using untested, unproven and potentially dangerous vaccines that could paralyze you or even kill you. All to defend you against a virus that’s so weak, almost anyone with decent levels of vitamin D and basic nutrition can resist the virus without incident.

But Massachusetts, as you’ll see below, is just the beginning. It turns out that the whole nation could soon find itself under a similar forced vaccination policy…

Isolation camps, forced vaccinations and more

In 2006, former President George Bush signed into law the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP). It gives power to the Secretary of the U.S. government’s Health and Human Services department (HHS) to declare any infectious disease a “national emergency” and therefore require mandatory vaccination of the entire population. Because of the existence of this PREP Act, the entire population of the USA is now but one pen stroke away from being subjected to mandatory swine flu vaccinations at gunpoint.

Those who resist such vaccines will be arrested and taken away for “isolation” in domestic prison camps. They can’t just leave vaccine refusers free to live among the population, of course, because that would send the message that anyone can refuse the vaccines without consequence. So they’ll arrest those who refuse the vaccine, labeling them “a threat to national security” (enemies of the state) and imprison them without trial, without charges and without any legal representation whatsoever.

Meanwhile, all those who take part in enforcing these crimes against the American people will be granted complete immunity. From the HHS website: “[the Secretary may] issue a declaration… that provides immunity from tort liability (except for willful misconduct) for claims of loss caused, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from administration or use of (vaccine or other pharmaceutical) countermeasures to diseases, threats and conditions determined by the Secretary to constitute a present, or credible risk of a future public health emergency…”

There are other laws already on the books that strip Americans of virtually all Constitutional rights in a “pandemic emergency” scenario. One such act is The Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act (S. 3678), which probably merits another article altogether.

Have no illusions: At the stroke of a pen, the Constitutional rights of all Americans will be immediately suspended. Mandatory vaccinations and “decontaminations” will kick in and the mass arrest of resisters will begin. There will be no court, no trial, no jury and no due process. Your actions will be dictated to you by a law enforcement officer or a health care worker who has been granted complete immunity, so if you just happen to get kicked around a bit (or shot), there’s really nothing you can do about it.

Some might argue these are necessary actions to save a nation from a deadly pandemic. And yet they forget that the pandemic has been intentionally allowed to worsen by censoring information about vitamin D and natural remedies that could stop it. Somebody at the top, in other words, wants this pandemic to get really bad, perhaps because it allows them to invoke precisely the draconian response I’ve outlined in this article. Seizing power in a Democracy cannot be accomplished by simply declaring war on the rights of the People. Rather, a situation must be engineered where the People are so desperate that they beg to be controlled. Releasing a pandemic into the wild is the perfect way to accomplish precisely that.

Timing

None of these laws will be invoked before the vaccines are ready in large numbers, of course. Part of the purpose in all this is to prop up Big Pharma profits with massive vaccination efforts, so until the vaccines are actually available, don’t expect to see any declarations of a public emergency.

It might take until October or November before the vaccines are readily available in sufficient quantity to inject just half the U.S. population. But once that milestone is reached, a declaration of a pandemic emergency is imminent. Trust me on this point: They won’t let all those hundreds of millions of vaccines sit around unused; they’ll make sure they get injected into the People as soon as possible, because that’s the only way to justify making more.

So the sequence of events we’re likely to see here are:

#1) Waiting on vaccine manufacturing to procure at least 150 million doses in the U.S. Probable timeframe = October.

#2) Hyping up a few local swine flu breakouts in schools in order to justify step #3. Probable timeframe = November / December.

#3) Declaring a full-blown national emergency and announcing mandatory vaccinations for everyone (to use up the vaccines that are now available). Probable timeframe = January / February / March.

#4) If the disease continues to spread, this is when you’ll see forced entry into homes and buildings, forced “decontamination” sprayings, widespread arrests and forced quarantine of resisters, Martial Law and a complete crackdown on freedoms (especially in the inner cities). This will likely continue through the winter until Spring arrives, bringing the sunshine that will suppress the virus around the May 2010 timeframe.

All this is written in black ink. It’s already part of the pandemic response plan. Body bags, FEMA camps and much more.

Two years ago, this was all the domain of conspiracy theory “wingnuts.” Now it’s State law. Now it’s being openly discussed in security conferences and health care meetings. What will we do when the hospital beds are full? How will we accomplish the “involuntary transportation” of those who are infected? Are there enough zip-tie handcuffs to go around? How do we disarm and arrest citizens who refuse to be vaccinated? How do we prevent National Guard troops from becoming infected themselves?

These are the questions circulating now at high levels, all across the world. And the answers are always the same: Abandon freedoms. Strip the People of any rights. Dictate from the top down and arrest anyone who gets in your way.

Welcome to the Land of the Free. I hope you are prepared for what looks to be coming, because this isn’t America anymore, folks. This is Amerika, and the Constitutional rights you thought you had are about to be written right off the books.